Qunu: an Open Source Approach to Realtime Q&A

Enabling people to convene and interact online in the same rich ways they can offline is the holy grail of social computing. Imagine being able to ask a question, on any subject and at any time, and getting an expert response in near realtime, via your IM client. Such is the idea behind Qunu.com. Qunu, which sounds like GNU—the license under which the site and its contents are licensed—is an open source approach (swarming) to Community Q&A, which is motivated by a desire to centralize (and qualify?) geographically-distributed domain expertise and then make it (the experts and their persisted answers to FAQs) available to the general public, for free. It’s an ambitious idea.

A few open questions and notes about Qunu:

  • Reputation and Tagging –
    • Users sign up as an expert (or “qunista”) by “tagging” themselves (ie, with a tag like “jabber” or “Gaim”).
    • How can you confirm or be assured of the integrity and trustworthiness of an expert or the probable accuracy of an answer they provide, using Qunu? Like eBay, a question and answer system like Qunu is essentially a marketplace of ideas. eBay does a good job of enabling reputable vendors to communicate their trustworthiness to buyers. Will Qunu enable “qunistas” to do so? If so, how?
    • Google solves this problem, by the way, by carefully screening its question answerers and charging $2.50 for each question you ask. Essentially, Google underwrites the accuracy of responses to your questions by charging you for them.
    • Microsoft Windows Live QnA (in beta) proposes to solve this problem in a more democratic, "open", and less costly way: by allowing consumers to rate the quality of answers through "Reputation-based scoring, so you know which sources are most reputable."
  • What in the world would motivate an “expert” to participate in Qunu?
    • Recognition? Qunu does a poor job of recognizing experts. Look at their Qunistas page. Note: they launched 39 days ago so I leave it open to the possibility that they might yet get around to rewarding Qunistas with recognition.
    • Money? Nope. Perhaps a business model involving micro-payments for questions answered will evolve but such will probably be years in coming, if ever. For a raft of "new economy" business models, see Everything 2.0.
  • WikiWiki, Authorization, and KM –
    • You must be logged in to edit the Qunu Wiki, which is a MediaWiki implementation (same as Wikipedia).
    • Since we're all about "real time" solutions, the traditional support forum just felt... "wrong". So instead of slapping up a phpBB like everyone else, we've decided to go with a wiki instead for bug reports, documentation and discussion. We invite you to add anything that you think fits.”
    • Increasingly, community owners are turning to Wikis as an alternative to Forums as a content persistence medium.
    • Where do people have back and forth conversations in such a venue? Every MediaWiki topic is accompanied by a “Discussion”, or ‘Talk Behind’ page. For example: http://qunu.com/wiki/index.php/Talk:RevenueModel.
  • Client Restrictions – Qunu supports “any jabber-enabled IM” client. No Messenger, which is too bad.
  • Qunu's competition: hmmm, Windows Live QnA, GoogleAnswers, forums, listservs, newsgroups, blogs...
Published 17 July 06 11:59 by KorbyP

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# Qunu: an Open Source Approach to Realtime Q&A » Wagalulu - Microsoft » » Qunu: an Open Source Approach to Realtime Q&A said on July 17, 2006 3:10 PM:
PingBack from http://microsoft.wagalulu.com/2006/07/17/qunu-an-open-source-approach-to-realtime-qa/
# Murray Gray said on July 17, 2006 10:07 PM:
hey corby

thanks for writing about us. hopefully i'll be able to address some of your questions and concerns!

you said: "Reputation and Tagging – How can you confirm or be assured of the integrity and trustworthiness of an expert or the probable accuracy of an answer they provide, using Qunu? Like eBay, a question and answer system like Qunu is essentially a marketplace of ideas. eBay does a good job of enabling reputable vendors to communicate their trustworthiness to buyers. Will Qunu enable “qunistas” to do so? If so, how?"

when experts add their tags to our system, they self-rate. after they give a support session, the person who was helped is invited to rate the session in two ways. how knowledgeable was the expert in that area? and how nice were they? these two elements, combined with their self-rating and a couple other things will add weight to the tags and control how high they appear in the result page for that tag.  this means experts rated poorly will drop in the results rather fast and stay there. experts that aren't visible don't get to invited to chat.

you said: "What in the world would motivate an “expert” to participate in Qunu?"

a lot of people are motivated to help out. that's excellent.  some people like to help on forums. some people like to hang out on IRC. some people don't have time or motivation to "lurk", waiting for questions to answer and would prefer that questions come to them. this is where Qunu is cool. the chat invites pop up in their jabber-friendly IM client in a form that allows the expert to accept or reject it. the expert can choose when and how they want to interact and offer their expertise. we are currenly working on more granular (time-based) controls on availability too which will allow experts to make themselves available only between certain hours of the day, etc..

you said: "Qunu does a poor job of recognizing experts. Look at their Qunistas page. Note: they launched 39 days ago so I leave it open to the possibility that they might yet get around to rewarding Qunistas with recognition."

fyi: i set that page up yesterday and it has nothing to do with recognition of experts who are giving help on Qunu. it's a page set up for those helping us with translations to throw their name onto. our translation project is just getting going but already we have German and Russian done, with Hungarian, Romanian, Dutch and Swedish in the pipeline (as you can see on the translations wiki page).  

but your overarching point is well taken and we are working on ways to publicly recognize the 1,500+ experts who have registered to provide help with us. the easiest and most obvious option is a public board showing those who are doing the most work and getting the best feedback, etc..

you said: "Client Restrictions – Qunu supports “any jabber-enabled IM” client. No Messenger, which is too bad."

yup. we're going to be looking at using the various transports that are available to see what they're capable of. Also we'll be trying to put proper agreements in place with the owners of the networks to ensure that we are allowed to interop with them. interestingly, most of the multi-protocol services out there have no agreements in place, are violating each TOS and are therefore technically breaking the law.

cheers! :)

Murray Gray
# Qunu - tech support of crowd at Kamal.co.in said on July 18, 2006 2:57 AM:
PingBack from http://kamal.co.in/index.php/2006/07/18/qunu-tech-support-of-crowd/

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 

Search

Go

This Blog

Syndication

Page view tracker